<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.workhabit.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>socialnetworks</title>
 <link>http://www.workhabit.com/category/tags/socialnetworks</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Is there room for a social media consulting specifically built around twitter, and if so, what specifically would they do?</title>
 <link>http://www.workhabit.com/labs/there-room-social-media-consulting-specifically-built-around-twitter-and-if-so-what-specificall</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;While Twitter has been the source of many articles speculating to it&#039;s monetization potential, no known articles exist that analyze the feasibility and potential market size of Twitter given leading ideas. This article examines five possible revenue models that we consider &quot;best bets&quot; for Twitter. From these models and observations, we consider the possibility of whether a full time, dedicated-to-twitter-based agency can exist, and what possible market they would serve. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.workhabit.com/labs/there-room-social-media-consulting-specifically-built-around-twitter-and-if-so-what-specificall&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.workhabit.com/labs/there-room-social-media-consulting-specifically-built-around-twitter-and-if-so-what-specificall#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.workhabit.com/category/tags/socialnetworks">socialnetworks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.workhabit.com/category/activity-stream-tags/twitter">twitter</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 22:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jonathan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2039 at http://www.workhabit.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The impact of attention research on social networking</title>
 <link>http://www.workhabit.com/labs/impact-attention-research-social-networking</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Is it possible that the nature of user&#039;s attention has changed, and continues to change in reaction to a change in communication brought about by social networks? I&#039;m trying to dive into more in-depth, research backed positions about some of the key issues that have been bothering me. I&#039;m using my background to find empirical information, rather than rely on anecdotal evidence. Most of the articles I read in other blogs on this subject rely on anecdotal evidence: increases in spam, increased search eliminating the need to know (when you can look up) &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.workhabit.com/labs/impact-attention-research-social-networking&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.workhabit.com/labs/impact-attention-research-social-networking#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.workhabit.com/category/tags/attention">attention</category>
 <category domain="http://www.workhabit.com/category/tags/socialnetworks">socialnetworks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.workhabit.com/category/tags/web2">web2</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 22:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jonathan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2038 at http://www.workhabit.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
